Miko Wassermann vs Tomi Van Den Ham Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wassermann vs Ham analysis and find out who is favored!
Miko Wassermann vs Tomi Van Den Ham Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wassermann 1 - 0 Ham
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wassermann has won 45.95% of points on their second serve, while Ham has won 39.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wassermann, in recent form, has won 52.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ham has won 61.19%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.32% and 38.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wassermann has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ham has saved 48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wassermann has won 12.5% of matches played (W/L 1/ 7), with Ham winning 39.13% (W/L 9/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wassermann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 7/ 13), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Ham has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 13/ 24), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Wassermann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 12.5% of matches (W/L 1/ 7), where as Ham has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wassermann winning 1 times and Ham being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wassermann winning 2 and Ham winning 0. The last match between Wassermann and Ham was at the M25 Oldenzaal, 22-08-2022, Q3, Clay with Miko Wassermann getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wassermann and Ham have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wassermann winning 0 times and Ham 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wassermann winning 0, and Ham 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wassermann has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ham has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wassermann has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ham has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wassermann has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ham has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Miko Wassermann
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
Tomi Van Den Ham
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
35% (9-17)
Career Total W/L
33% (16-33)
50% (1-1)
YTD W/L
33% (3-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wassermann VS Ham H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Miko Wassermann | Tomi Van Den Ham |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:20:0 | 1:20:0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (36/57) | 62% (39/63) |
1st Serve Win% | 72% (26/36) | 67% (26/39) |
2nd Serve Win% | 62% (13/21) | 42% (10/24) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 50% (1/2) |
Return Points W% | 43% (27/63) | 32% (18/57) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Wassermann VS Ham H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Miko Wassermann
Player
Tomi Van Den Ham
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Miko Wassermann | Tomi Van Den Ham |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (1/1) | 33% (3/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 38% (8/13) |
Games Win/Loss | 58% (29/21) | 44% (87/112) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 33% (3/6) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.04 |
Aces Total | 0 | 4 |
DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.18 |
DFs Total | 7 | 18 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 47% (33/70) | 46% (91/200) |
1st Serve W% | 73% (24/33) | 62% (56/91) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (17/37) | 39% (43/109) |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (3/6) | 50% (12/24) |
Return Pts W% | 34% (20/58) | 48% (80/168) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 33% (3/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 33% (3/9) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/3) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 60% (5/3) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 40% (5/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Miko Wassermann Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Pavel Verbin
Player
Miko Wassermann
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 3-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Olivier Rojas
Player
Miko Wassermann
43%
(
32 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
7
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Tomi Van Den Ham Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-7 6-1 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Pengyu Lu
Player
Tomi Van Den Ham
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
32 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-3 10-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Michel Hopp
Player
Tomi Van Den Ham
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
42%
(
30 of
71)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Tomi Van Den Ham
Player
Christian Fellin
46%
(
26 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 3-6 7-6(2) 10-6 | H2H |
view more